Thursday, July 21, 2005

Blog Mood Tracking?


If you're interested in blogology, weird aspects of blogging, new technologies in blogs, you really need to bookmark and visit daily Plastic Bag blog.

Let's look together, as colleagues in search of new glimmers of insight into this thing we call blogging, at his recent essay on Blog Mood Tracking.

Now you have to know that both your post content and posting moods are being observed and duly noted.

Bookmark as a favorite: Plastic Bag.


It's...


[QUOTE]


A weblog by Tom Coates who works at BBC Radio and Music Interactive

Concerning social software, mass-amateurisation, design, and future media

You can subscribe to an RSS feed, read the disclaimer or explore the archives



On Live Journal mood tracking and zeitgeists...

Posted July 8, 2005 03:14 PM.

There are two or three major things I'm thinking about at the moment - and one of them is zeitgeists.

Which brings me rapidly to The World according to LiveJournal

http://ilps.science.uva.nl/
cgi-bin/livejournal/mood

which is an awesome tracking system of LiveJournal moods over the last seven days.

If you go and look at it now and try moods like 'sympathetic', 'distressed' or 'nauseated' you can see that the bombings in London have had a real impact on people's moods.

If you invetigate more thoroughly you can see that other moods have been inversely affected or show more complex relationships. There was a parallel drop on 'horny' during the coverage, an enormous drop in 'irritated' which then turned into a spike. Fewer people felt 'guilty', more felt 'grateful'.

A couple of obvious things fall out of this for me - you could use this data to articulate relationships in moods really effectively - which things in the world cause reactions, what kinds of reactions do they cause, which moods are more closely correlated or act against one another.

I keep looking for clear moods that you'd expect to see appearing twenty four hours after an event like this, but so far I'm only seeing a few (people seemed to become irate in two major spikes - I wonder why).

Another obvious thing would be to use this data to alert people to things that were going on in the world or to track trends over time.

I believe that LiveJournal knows which country people are from - combining that data with the stuff from the site would be tremendously useful.

Sending alerts to news gathering organisations would be interesting too.

Mood expression and collation is such a fascinating area and has some real possibilities for data-mining and zeitgeist taking.

Can anyone else think of good ways to get this information from people and to employ it - ideally in an open way?

The best I can come up with off the top of my head is AIM status messages using controlled vocabularies and opened up in some spiderable fashion...


Comments

Please stay on-topic, informative and polite. I reserve the right to remove comments for whatever vague capricious reasons seem reasonable at the time.



http://www2.imood.com/imood.cgi

Same kinda thing.

→ Posted by: Tom Morris at July 8, 2005 05:37 PM



Very interesting. I have a few thoughts for expanding it. First, incorporate LiveJournal's group membership data to show how different moods spread (or don't spread) among a social network.

Second, tailor application functionality to mood. A search engine could return mood-influenced results. An email client could add more steps when sending angry emails. iTunes could have a special mood music mode. If the user could add mood in a single location and make it available to a variety of applications, the added functionality would vastly increase incentive to track the data.

Third, the input should be easier and more pervasive. LiveJournal only collects moods when entries are written, but something like a cell phone could track mood all the time, and even reject calls from certain people under certain moods, e.g. don't ring when parents are calling and mood is "drunk."

→ Posted by: Scott Reynen at July 8, 2005 08:03 PM



I wonder how accurate these moods are, how defined, how implied in oblique statements.

Much of blog writing is sarcastic, tongue in cheek, or just plain nuts.

How about quotes and reblogging? An angry blog post quote in a blog post at a different blog equals...what?

I've tried tracking "flames", "disagree", "argue", and such on a blog tracking/mapping site. I was tracking occurence of word, not actual activity designated by word, nor surely not the mood behind it.

Men often don't even have moods. And when we do, we have difficulty expressing them in words. Most male moods are actually physical hunger, fear of financial loss, or just plain tired. Not much emotive power in them. We cannot cry.

I'd like to know characteristics of male vs. female bloggers and blogs.

But are the diagnostic methodologies and technologies really precise as yet?

→ Posted by: steven streight aka vaspers the grate at July 21, 2005 02:56 PM



[END QUOTE]



So there you have it.

Don't you just love corporate curiosity?

I'm sure mood monitoring will result in remarkable new products of great value and at low costs. Yuh. Right.

Attention: you are surrounded. You cannot launch a counter-attack.

All your moods are belong to us.



[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

No comments: