Thursday, June 02, 2011

Vaspers The Grate podcasts on Blog Talk Radio PLAYER


Listen to internet radio with StevenStreight on Blog Talk Radio

Hey hey hey. It's Vaspers the Grate Presents. Welcome to Vaspers New Reformed Blogorama podcast show on Blog Talk Radio.

Check out my interviews with big stars and key thought leaders in the social media and business world. Experts and innovators like BL Ochman, Yvonne DiVita, Wayne Hurlbert, Toby Bloomberg, Becky McCray, Billy Dennis the Peoria Pundit, and more.

Also be sure to catch my infamous Vaspers rants and tirades on web usability, small business strategy, and social media, including special audio essays on blogocombat against trolls.




Monday, May 30, 2011

I blog to hear myself blog



“I blog to hear myself blog.”


With that explosive remark, I officially re-launch my old, original blog: Vaspers the Grate. This inflammatory statement, with "please go away" overtones, is in response to a post by [blogger name deleted].

Yes indeed -- I blog to hear myself blog.

I blog primarily to improve my writing and to sharpen my thinking. I blog to render my ideas in a concrete form, to push them out of my head, and to then move on to other thoughts.

Comments, likes, shares, followers, fans, friends — they mean absolutely nothing. Such "ratings" can be easily gamed, spammed, and artificially (non-organically) manipulated. Digg, Empire Avenue, Blog Shares, and Stumble Upon are great examples of easily gamed social popularity sites. I have no use for such nonsense.

Trying to drive your numbers up is just using social media as a video game and scoring points. That’s okay with me if others treat blogging and Facebooking and Twittering in this manner, but it's not my cup of tea.

Popularity contests are silly because the wildly popular junk is boring and irrelevant to me, like popular music or popular movies. If it’s popular, it’s generally MEDIOCRE and just trendy and hyped fluff and nonsense.

I wrote about Readerless Blogging in May of 2005. Since that time, my conviction has grown in clarity and intensity.


This is not reverse psychology. I am completely sincere when I say "I don't blog for any audience or to be liked by anyone." I admit that long ago, I did labor intensely to become famous, accepted, respected. But now, all those goals are gone.

Nowadays I blog only to express myself -- to myself. I have no desire to address any audience, market, or niche. I blog for basically no audience at all.

At best, I strive to create a body of work (Pluperfecter) that embodies my personal beliefs and private dreams. I seek to have some opus to point to when a potential client wants to see samples of my writing. But even in that case, I prefer to provide them with dead tree magazine articles I've written on various web usability, social media, and business topics.

When I first started blogging, I did indeed try to form relationships and interactions with other bloggers. To accomplish this goal, I used blogrolls linking to favorite bloggers, and I posted tons of comments on other blogs.

I even compiled a book called Secrets of the Blog Pros, based on a micro-questionnaire of two questions that I emailed to all the top bloggers around 2006, most of whom answered the "Blog Pro Survey". I think I had about 100 responses. O'Reilly was going to publish it, but then declined at the last minute. That's okay with me.

After about 4 or 5 years of this futile endeavor, I finally saw the light. I quit blogging to an audience. I stopped posting comments on other people’s blogs.

While I did attract a lot of attention when I was “trying to become popular”, and a legend rose up around Vaspers the Grate, and I still have some hardcore loyal fans…

…I now reject all that and care absolutely nothing about popularity. 

I have a strong desire to be obscure, ignored, unpopular.

I deliberately publish only a few posts a month (8-10) instead of daily.

I don't post comments on other people's blogs.

I don't include blogrolls on my blogs.

I don't have a Facebook page.

I use Twitter primarily to rant about politics and religion, which a business blogger, like myself, should NEVER do if they seek popularity and the respect of colleagues and peers.

Even my Str8 Sounds music is done under the radar, with no effort to make money or please any audience.

I now please only myself, and if one or two people benefit or enjoy it, that’s their fault, not mine. It’s purely accidental. I do not seek or encourage it.

I despise popularity. The greatest art is usually unknown or dismissed during the life of the artist. What I seek now is a tiny handful of like-minded colleagues to collaborate with and to inspire and be inspired by.

I reject fame and fortune. I do not want to succeed. I want to accomplish something far more subtle and subversive.

I am not anonymous or paranoid, but I admire the ascetic hermits who lived in caves in the desert. I seek to share my insights and to help others, but I prefer to do it with no acclaim, no accolades, no appreciation.

I do tweet links to my occasional blog posts and my podcasts, but I prefer, as Seth Godin once said, to be stumbled upon, than be discovered via heavy promotional campaigns.

When nobody cares about what you do, you are far more free to create what your vision dictates to you.

When you’re famous and admired, you’re a prisoner to fan and entourage expectations, a slave to doing whatever it takes to retain the celebrity status, please the disciples, and compromise your integrity and vision.

My favorite people are obscure, barely known to the masses, popular only to small groups of specialists.

For example: Harold Garfinkel (founder of Ethnomethodology), Iannis Xenakis (inventor of stochastic music and noise music), Langdon Winner (author of Autonomous Technology and exposer of the tyranny of The Technological Imperative).

Unpopular. Unknown. Uncared about.

That’s the ideal condition for a creative, innovative person.

Should you then continue reading this blog, or listening to my podcasts or music, or paying attention to anything I do?

That's up to you. But I strongly advise you to think carefully about your decision. You see, if you become aware of my writings and music and lectures, you may experience a deep and fundamental transformation at the very core of your being.

A change you may not be able to control.

A transition to a very different mode of being, that will make you unpopular, disliked, and rejected by employers, family, friends, and others.

It won't be my fault. You will have brought it on yourself, after having been warned.


Sincerely not yours,


Vaspers the Grate aka Steven Streight



Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Yes it is back



Imagine there's no Vaspers. It's impossible to try. Okay. Here we are again.

I locked up this blog and buried it for 3 years for various reasons. Those reasons no longer hold sway, so I have decided to unleash this monstrosity again, in hopes that nobody will care.

If you are a visitor here for the first time, I suggest you move on. This is not a "sticky" site. This is a blog that prefers to remain in the shadows. It is emerging from obscurity only to prove a point: you cannot stop it.

I write for myself and myself alone. I do not write for you.

Please go find a blog that seeks companionship, admiration, or popularity. This blog is different. It exists for itself, not any audience. While I have enabled comments, this blog does not seek to form relationships with anybody and it does not seek to engage in any other interactions.

Thanks for your lack of comprehension and your full cooperation.

Sunday, June 01, 2008

corporate honesty in social media



Blogging and social media usage has a netiquette and a clear, if not always publicized, set of ethics and morals, a consensus list of rules for conduct. Not to limit creativity or innovation, but to use the new tools most effectively. This means deviating from old school corporate fluff, we-orientation, and MSM hype.

What are some of these new values that are reigning in the new media?


Authenticity. Passion. Transparency.


Three of the values that some old fashioned organizations consistently violate, thinking they can get away with it.
Incentivized opinions are not wanted, nor respected, in the social media realm.

It’s like your husband being secretly paid by a university, in an ethnomethodology experiment, to say romantic things to you, at $10 per statement. Once you found out he was being paid to seduce you, you’d surely be quite disgusted and upset, never trusting his advances ever again.

It’s PayPerPost and other compensated, coached, inauthentic recommendations, or slurs and reproaches, that will poison, pollute, and make worthless the peer-to-peer recommendation system of the social media sphere.

Corporate use of social media cannot be a crass, greedy gaming and exploitation of the online community members. Such BS will backfire. It's marketing suicide, and will be very time-consuming and expensive to correct.

Target has been caught in such deceptive antics. See: "off target".


[QUOTE]

newsletter (issue #107) from Target Rounders saying:

Your mission: try not to let on in the Facebook group that you are a Rounder. We love your enthusiasm for the Rounders, and I know it can be hard not to want to sing it from the mountaintops (and the shower, and on the bus…).

However, we want to get other members of the Facebook group excited about Target, too! And we don’t want the Rounders program to steal the show from the real star here: Target and Target’s rockin’ Facebook group! So keep it like a secret!

[END QUOTE]


Lying is, unfortunately, a prevalent advertising, and PR practice, that is rejected in the social media realm.

Bloggers are feared, because they'll bash, flame, and destroy any company caught in such immoral and counter-productive behaviors.

Social media communities tend to keep things ethical, creative, and of great practical value. You can insert your messages into the blogosphere, but try to make the core of that message e around this implied attitude:

"Your problems are understood by us. Here's how our products can solve them efficiently, economically, and reliably."

Sunday, May 25, 2008

enforcing Terms of Service violations





If you provide Terms of Service (TOS), are you ethically or legally obligated to enforce them? Let's look at the Twitter TOS controversy, from a simple, common sense point of view.

Ariel Waldman is a Twitter user. She complained to Twitter about another user who was harassing her on Twitter. This was beyond mere disagreement or a casual "you're nuts" type comment. The harassment involved filthy language.

Twitter, not known for being open to user requests and suggestions, not only did not enforce their own Terms of Service. They also shamed the victim, whined about their small staff, and declared they were "offended" at the victim accusing them of not caring about users.

This is not the proper way for a company to respond.


Some relevant items from Twitter's Terms of Service (due to change soon):


[QUOTE]

4. You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users.

...

Violation of any of these agreements will result in the termination of your Twitter.com account.

While Twitter.com prohibits such conduct and content on its site, you understand and agree that Twitter cannot be responsible for the Content posted on its web site and you nonetheless may be exposed to such materials and that you use the Twitter.com service at your own risk.

...
    We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.

    We may, but have no obligation to, remove Content and accounts containing Content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party's intellectual property or these Terms of Use.


    [END QUOTE]



    Did Twitter stand true to their TOS, and account removal policy, in Ariel's case, or were they negligent?

    Here's the TOS / Ariel Waldman debate on the Twitter blog.

    http://blog.twitter.com/2008/05/
    twitter-enforces-tos-cares-about-users.html

    More here: Summize archive re: Ariel.

    And here: Twitter refuses to uphold Terms of Service.

    It's not "mediating disputes between people" that's the issue here. It's enforcing your TOS.

    You decide if you like Twitter's tone and handling of this situation. Personally, I do not.

    Saturday, May 24, 2008

    blogs are the NASCAR of the internet




    Corporations can learn a lot from NASCAR.

    People are losing faith in corporations, for many reasons. People are sick of the aloof, pompous, unapproachable nature of many CEOs and companies. Customer service is often reluctant, insincere, and even outsourced to individuals who don't speak good English.

    Blogs can repair much of the damage to public perception of corporations.

    If the CEO, or some passionate and informed company spokesperson, has a blog, then trust can be built. Customers and prospects can post comments, which may be questions, suggestions, or criticisms. A smart business values all input, both positive and negative.

    Increasingly, in the new digital world we live in, if you don't have a blog, you don't exist.

    If you don't have a blog, you send this message:

    "I don't care about starting conversations with anybody. Why form relationships? Why be transparent? Why value customer input? I value only customer dollars. Buy my product now."

    Dale Earnhardt, Jr., in his book Driver #8 (page 5-6), said:

    "Being a Winston Cup driver means being accessible to the fans. This accessibility is the basis of NASCAR's popularity...

    The drivers have known for years they weren't anything without the fans. So they signed autographs, did interviews, and they let the fans get close and see them. The fans felt like they knew the drivers personally, and the result was fan loyalty.

    This continues today. When a lot of other sports see declining loyalty among fans and players, NASCAR fans remain faithful."

    Blogs enable your customers to get close to you.

    Implemented correctly, a CEO blog can be far more effective than any sporadic damage control PR. To ignore the blogosphere is to remain stuck in Business As Usual, which leads to Business As Over.